Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-18

WRIT - A No. 1977 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1977 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1977 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

In The High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Sitting At Lucknow Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10413-DB A.F.R. Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1977 of 2025 Petitioner :- U.O.I. Thru. The Secy. Ministry Of Railway Nr New Delhi And 2 Others Respondent :- Sri Santosh Kumar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Tripathi Hon’ble Attau Rahman Masoodi J. Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi J. 1. Heard Sri Vinay Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners - Union of India. 2. By means of the instant Writ Petition, the petitioners have challenged the validity of the judgment and order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, in Original Application No. 332/00317 of 2021. 3. At the outset, we noted that the Central Administrative Tribunal, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow has been arrayed as the respondent no. 2 in this Writ Petition, although the practice of impleading Courts and Tribunals has been deprecated repetitively. 4. In Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. Addl. Member Board of Revenue: AIR 1963 SC 786, a Bench consisting of four Hon’ble Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court had held that in a Writ of Certiorari not only the tribunal or authori

WRIT - A No. 1977 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam