Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-04

WRIT - A No. 18933 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18933 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18933 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:15073 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18933 of 2024 Petitioner :- Lalu Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kiran Rani,Laloo Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ved Mani Tiwari Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Ved Mani Tiwari, learned counsel for respondents. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court questioning the decision of the Medical Board whereby the petitioner has been declared unfit for hydrocele. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner's hydocele is normal as he got examined himself privately at Hospital where it has been found normal though he has been rejected. 4. Per contra it is argued by Sri Ved Mani Tiwari, learned counsel for respondents that opinion of Medical Board duly constituted by the respondent- recruitment authority cannot be judicial reviewed by this Court in exercise of superintendence power under Article 226 of the Constitution. 5. Sri Ved Mani Tiwari, learned counsel for respondents has relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Ankit Kumar v. State of U.P. and others passed in Writ - A No.- 56

WRIT - A No. 18933 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam