WRIT - A No. 18907 of 2024 at Allahabad

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:15250 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18907 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sintu Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akshay Kumar Shukla,Shubhi Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Pooja Agarwal,A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel for respondents. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court questioning the decision of the Medical Board whereby the petitioner has been declared unfit for high blood pressure. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner's blood pressure is perfect as he got examined himself privately at Hospital where it has been found normal, though he has been rejected 4. Per contra it is argued byMs. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel for respondents that opinion of Medical Board duly constituted by the respondent- recruitment authority cannot be judicial reviewed by this Court in exercise of superintendence power under Article 226 of the Constitution. 5. Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel for respondents has relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Ankit Kumar v. State of U.P. and others passed