WP/958/2021 of SEERAM CHINNA DHANAYYA (DIED) Vs THE GOVERNMENT OF AP

APHC010012812021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3332] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 958 OF 2021 Between: Seeram Chinna Dhanayya (died) and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Government Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOMMULA VENKATA RATNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: The short grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.4, his subordinates and other revenue officials, highhandly and without following law, are interfering with the petitioners’ possession, and thereby threatening to demolish the structures in the land to an extent of Ac.0.21 cents in Survey No.19 at Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam. 2. Heard Sri C.Leela Srinivas Varma, learned counsel representing Sri Kommula Venkata Ratna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. Sri C.Leela Srinivas Varma, learned counsel representing Sri Kommula Venkata Ratna Rao, learned counsel for the peti