WP/30961/2024 of KALE RAMANAMMA Vs THE STATE OF AP

APHC010589322024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No: 30961/2024 Between: Kale Ramanamma ...PETITIONER AND The State Of AP and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Ms. T.Saranya, learned counsel representing Smt. Kale Ramanamma, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the present Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in suspending the cheque power of the writ petitioner and subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, the respondents have restored the cheque power of the writ petitioner and hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall sta