WP/28080/2007 of M.MUKUNDA RAO, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. Vs APSRTC BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HYD.& 2 OTHERS

APHC010217632007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3504] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28080/2007 Between: M.mukunda Rao, Srikakulam District. ...PETITIONER AND Apsrtc By Executive Director Hyd 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following Order: On 24.01.2025 & 31.01.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter is listed today i.e., 20.02.2025 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. 2. Despite the fact that the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents - A.P.S.R.T.C., submits that the petitioner was retired on 30.06.2019. 2 MRK,J W.P.No.28080 of 2007 4. From the above, it appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a