Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-02-06

WP/27040/2015 of M.PRAMILA, KRISHNA DISTRICT Vs PRL SECY, MUNICIPAL ADMN & URBAN DEVT., HYDERABAD & ANR

Citation / case number
APHC010477452015
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
WP/27040/2015 of M.PRAMILA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
Respondent
PRL SECY, MUNICIPAL ADMN & URBAN DEVT., HYDERABAD & ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 APHC010477452015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 27040/2015 Between: M.pramila, Krishna District ...PETITIONER AND Prl Secy Municipal Admn Urban Devt ...RESPONDENT(S) Hyderabad Anr and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G JHANSI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. S PRANATHI 2 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not acting upon the application of the petitioner as acknowledged by the 2nd respondent on 25.04.2015 and not granting the permission for release of lay out under the deeming provision of Section 110 (4) of the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act 2014 even after receiving the intimation of invocation of Section 110 (4) of the Act on 01.08.2015 after the expiry of 98 days as illegal