WP/25008/2016 of K. Vidyasagar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal

APHC010699822016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 25008/2016 Between: K. Vidyasagar, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Represented By Its ...RESPONDENT(S) Principal and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 2. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI 3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to pass an order or direction or writ more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by duly declaring action of the third respondent in rejecting the appeal on the ground that the civil suit is pending, in spite of Honourable High Court directions in WP No. 25612/2015 as well as WP No. 3767/2016, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the impugned resolution number 568 dated 31-03-2016 and cancel the permission vide No. 115