WP/15985/2005 of A. VENKATA RAMUDU, KURNOOL DISTRICT. Vs THE RAYALASEEMA GRAMEENA BANK, AND 2 OTHERS

APHC010339582005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3504] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15985/2005 Between: A. Venkata Ramudu, Kurnool District. ...PETITIONER AND The Rayalaseema Grameena Bank And 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MOGALLA SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. K SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following ORDER: There was no representation for the petitioner on the last two occasions i.e., on 31.02.2024 and 28.01.2025. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 21.02.2025 GVK 2 48 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.15985 of 2005 Date: 21.02.2025 G