Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-28

VAIBHAV KUMAR vs STATE THROUGH SHO RAJOURI GARDEN

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-484/2025 2025:DHC:1332
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VAIBHAV KUMAR
Respondent
STATE THROUGH SHO RAJOURI GARDEN

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.02.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 484/2025 VAIBHAV KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Ms. Sakshi Jha and Ms. Aakanksha Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH SHO RAJOURI GARDEN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. By way of this bail application preferred under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [hereafter „BNSS‟], the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 1525/2014, registered at the Police Station (P.S.) Rajouri Garden, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 326A/392/394/397/120B/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter „IPC‟]. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that on BAIL APPLN. 484/2025 Page 1 of 12 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:28.02.2025 18:19:52 23.12.2014, a PCR call was received vide DD No. 30B whereby it was informed that an acid attack had taken place in main market of Rajouri Garden, after which, the concerned police official had reached the spot and had found one scooty parked there on which some droplets of chemical were found. In the meanwhile, another information was received vide DD No. 33B that the victim Dr. „A‟ had been admitted at ESI Hospital, Basai Darapur, Delhi, as she had sustained serious injuries on her face and eye due to acid being thrown at her. Thereafter, the victim was referred to AIIMS Hospital, Delhi for further treatment. Accordingly, the investigating officer had reached the hospital and recorded the statement of the victim/complainant Dr. „A‟ who had stated that on the day of incident i.e. 23.12.2014 when she was g

VAIBHAV KUMAR vs STATE THROUGH SHO RAJOURI GARDEN · Niyam