SUMIT KUMAR vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24.02.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4161/2024 SUMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Shalini, PS Paharganj Mr. Harshit Jain, Adv (DHCLSC) Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Mr. Shantanu Sharma and Mr. Raghav Vij, Advocates for R-2/Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL): 1. The present application has been filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) for seeking grant of regular bail in FIR No. 762/2023 registered under Sections 313/376/201/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at Police Station (P.S.) Paharganj. Brief Facts 2. As per the case of the prosecution set out in the Status Report, on the statement of the complainant SSSS/victim on 13.09.2023 the captioned FIR was registered. Signature Not Verified Signed By:RASHMI DABAS BAIL APPLN. 4161/2024 Page 1 of 12 Signing Date:26.02.2025 19:12:32 2.1. It is stated that the victim informed that she works in a private enterprise known as CG & Company and is also preparing for government jobs and physical test for police recruitment. It is stated that the victim came in contact with the Applicant in a park. It is stated that the victim started talking with the Applicant on Facebook and they both exchanged numbers. It is stated that the Applicant told the victim that he wants to marry her. It is stated that before they could get married the Applicant was recruited in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). It is stated that thereafter the Applicant asked the victim to secure a job so t