SUDESH & ANR vs JITENDER KUMAR BHARDWAJ & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.02.2025 + RC.REV. 658/2015 SUDESH & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vaibhav Sinha, Adv. versus JITENDER KUMAR BHARDWAJ & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ikrant Sharma, Mr. Saksham Mittal, Mr. Ira Arora, Mr. Neeraj Sharma Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM Appl.6451/2025[Seeking condonation of delay] 1. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioners/tenants seeking condonation of delay of 22 days in filing the Application for restoration of the present Petition. 2. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned. 3. The Application stands disposed of. CM Appl.6450/2025[For restoration] 4. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioners/tenants seeking restoration of the present Petition which was dismissed by this Court by an order dated 05.12.2024. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:19.03.2025 RC.REV. 658/2015 Page 1 of 11 09:51:47 5. Learned Counsel for the Respondents/landlords submits that the matter is pending for 10 years and in the interest of expediency, he does not object if the prayers made in the present Application are allowed. 6. The Application stands disposed of. RC.REV. 658/2015 7. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners/tenants impugning the order dated 27.07.2015 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned SCJ-cum-RC, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi with respect to the premises i.e., shop in WZ-84, Mohan Nagar, Pankha Road, New Delhi-110046 admeasuring 8’X12’ as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]. By the Impu