SUBHASH KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:25th February, 2025 + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 5/2025 SUBHASH KUMAR SINGH S/o Late Jagnarayan Singh .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tej Pratap, Advocate. versus 1. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DEL Through SHO, PS Madhu Vihar, Delhi-110092 ....Respondent No.1 2. MS. JYOTI SINGH ALIAS JYOTI TIWARI D/o S.N. Tiwari ...Respondent No. 2 3. AAYAN PRATAP SINGH/AAYANSH PRATAP S/o Subhash Kumar Singh ...Respondent No. 3 Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A.6062/2025 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 6061/2025 (under Section 379 of BNSS) 3. An Application under Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 5/2025 Page 1 of 5 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:12.03.2025 13:44:51 Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘B.N.S.S.’) (Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) has been filed on behalf of the Respondent No. 2, Ms. Jyoti Singh @ Jyoti Tiwari against the Petitioner for the act of Perjury under Section 227/228/229 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (Section 191, 192, 193 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860). 4. It is submitted in the Application that the Petitioner had made a false Statement on Oath in Paragraph No. M at Page No. 27 of the Crl.Rev.Pet. (MAT) No. 5/2025, titled Satish Kumar Singh vs. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors., filed before this Court. It was stated that the learned Family Court has not considered that he has dependent parents to look after and also a sister, who has bad health and he has to spend a good amount of money. The