Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-18

STATE vs GOKUL

Citation / case number
CRL.A.-346/2021 2025:DHC:1139
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
STATE
Respondent
GOKUL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18th February, 2025 CRL.A. 346/2021 STATE (GNCT of Delhi) .....Appellant Through Secretary GNCT of Delhi Through: Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Bharat Singh, PS Uttam Nagar. versus GOKUL .....Respondent S/o Sh. Makhann Lal, R/o B-224, J.J Colony Shiv Vihar, Delhi Through: Mr.Bharat Bhushan Bhatia and Mr.Jagjit Singh Anand, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The Appeal under Section 377 (1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter “Cr.P.C”) has been filed by the State to seek enhancement of the sentence of one month along with fine of Rs.1 lakh under Section 12 of the POCSO Act in FIR No. 31/2013, registered at Police Station, Uttam Nagar, granted to the Respondent vide Order dated 29.11.2019 by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. 2. The State has not challenged the judgment of Conviction dated 2019. No Appeal has been preferred by the Complainant. 3. The enhancement of compensation is sought on the grounds that the Sentence granted by the learned ASJ, is against the principles of law and amounts to injustice. Reliance is placed in Ravi vs. State of