STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. vs VIKAS

Judgment text excerpt

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2236/2025 and CM APPLs. 10449-10450/2025 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC with Mr. Vikrant Goyal, Ms. Shweta Shandilya and Mr. Saksham Sethi, Advocates versus VIKAS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Mr. Setu Niket and Ms. Unni, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 20.02.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The order dated 20 May 2024 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA 1516/2024, under challenge in this writ petition, at the instance of the Staff Selection Commission, reads as under: “In the instant OA, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- “i. Call for records of the case; ii. Quash and set aside the order dated 29/01/2024 passed by Review Medical Board. iii. Pass an order directing the Respondents to constitute an independent Medical Board and to conduct the medical examination of the applicant; iv. Pass an order directing respondents to Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT W.P.(C) 2236/2025 Page 1 of 3 KUMAR Signing Date:01.03.2025 18:06:34 appoint the applicant to the post of Constable (Exe.) Male with all consequential benefits including arrears, etc along with interest at GPF rates; v. Award cost of the proceedings: and vi. Pass any order/relief/direction (s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice in favour of the applicant.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue raised in this OA stands concluded by the decision of this Tribunal titled as Ravi Prakash vs. Staff Selection Commission & Ors.1 decided on 14.05.2024. 3. For parity of reasons, we allow the present OA in terms of the dir