Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-02-13

SOJAR ALIAS RUKMINBAI W/O HARI MULE vs KRISHNATH ALIS KRISHNA S/O GOPAL TATE AND ORS

Citation / case number
WP/2679/2024
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
SOJAR ALIAS RUKMINBAI W/O HARI MULE
Respondent
KRISHNATH ALIS KRISHNA S/O GOPAL TATE AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

WP-2679.24-J-FF.DOCX Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2679 OF 2024 Sojar @ Rukminibai W/o Hari Mule ] Age – 66 Yrs. Occu. - House Hold ] & Agriculture ] R/o. - Bavi, Tal – Osmanabad ] District – Osmanabad ]…Petitioner Versus 1] Krishnath @ Krishna S/o Gopal Tate ] Age – 75 Yrs. Occu – Agri ] ] 2] Santosh S/o Bharat Tate ] Age – 25 Yrs. Occu. - Agri. ] ] AMOL 3] Bharat S/o Krishna Tate ] PREMNATH Age – 50 Yrs. Occu. - Agri. ] JADHAV ] 3. Mr. A. R Deolekar, AGP, for the Respondent – State. Mr. Bharat K. Tate – Respondent No.3 present. ______________________________________________________ CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. Reserved on :- 07 February 2025 Pronounced on :- 13 February 2025 JUDGMENT : (Per M. S. Sonak, J.) 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner seeks the following substantive reliefs by instituting this Petition. “(A.) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction call