SMT. ANJALI ANAND KHARE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

Digitally signed by ARUNA ARUNA SANDEEP SANDEEP TALWALKAR TALWALKAR Date: 206.WP77.2022.odt 2025.03.04 11:23:24 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2022 Smt. Anjali Anand Khare. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. **** Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Yash Agarwal, i/b. Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Anbhule a/w. Ms. Nisha Ahire, Ms. Pooja Pal, for Respondent No. 4. Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent/State. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2025 JUDGMENT (Per RAVINDRA V GHUGE,J) 1. Leave to add prayer clause (d-1) with regard to the claim for pension. Addition be carried out forthwith. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties. 3. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that since the Petitioner would superannuate in March, 2025, Talwalkar 1 206.WP77.2022.odt prayer clause (d) will not be pressed. The learned Senior Advocate on instructions submits that the Petitioner is now concerned with the Pension since she would be helpless after superannuation if the pension is not paid. All other issues are not significant for her considering the importance of pension. 4. The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (a), (b) & (d-1) which read as under : “a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 directing the Respondent No. 2 & 3 to condone/set aside all the objections raised against her and her services be regularised under the salary head of the Maharashtra .State Government - Grant-in-Aid Salary budget. b) That thi