Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-17

SHAQIB vs SHRI. ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS

Citation / case number
CONT.CAS(C)-61/2025 2025:DHC:1044
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SHAQIB
Respondent
SHRI. ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17th February, 2025 CONT.CAS(C) 61/2025 SHAQIB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain, Advocate (Through VC). versus SHRI. ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu, Mr. Harsh Vashisht and Mr. Hari Mohan, Advocates for STF, DDA. Mr. Kapil Dutta and Mr. Vansh Luthra, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Mr. MD. Talha and Mr. Ayush Dassi, Advocates for R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Sh. Sushil Kumar Jain, learned counsel for petitioner appears through video conferencing. 2. There is appearance from the side of respondent No.1 MCD, respondent No.2 STF/DDA and respondent No.7, who is stated to be the owner/ builder of P-100, Nafees Road, Pehlwan Chowk, Batla House, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi – 110025. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the MCD submits that nothing survives in the present contempt petition. He submits that the petitioner had filed W.P.(C). 15051/2024 and the learned Division Bench, while observing that the writ petition was premature, dismissed 4. It is informed by learned counsel for MCD th

SHAQIB vs SHRI. ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS · Niyam