Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-10

SH. VIJAY BANSAL vs SMT. BEENA TRIPATHI

Citation / case number
RFA(COMM)-64/2025 2025:DHC:847-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SH. VIJAY BANSAL
Respondent
SMT. BEENA TRIPATHI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(COMM) 64/2025 and CM APPL. 6230-6231/2025 SH. VIJAY BANSAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Jatan Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Avnish Kumar Tyagi, Mr. Shreshtha Rao, Ms. Vanshika Adhana and Mr. Tushar Lamba, Advocate with appellant versus SMT. BEENA TRIPATHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Narendra Singh Negi and Mr. Ashish Negi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 10.02.2025 1. After some hearing, Mr. Jatan Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, submits, on instructions from Mr. Avnish Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the appellant, and the appellant himself, who is also present in Court, that his client would vacate the suit property situated at C-16/1, Dispensary Road, Near Bhajanpura Thana, Bhajanpura, Delhi-110053, within a period of six months from today and would also pay rent and user charges in respect of the property to the respondent periodically during the said period. 2. We make it clear that the responsibility to make this payment cannot be avoided on the ground that there is no electricity, water or RFA(COMM) 64/2025 3. The appellant is also directed to file