Delhi High Court · 2025-02-25
SH. SATYA PRAKASH & ANR. vs STATE & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- CRL.M.C.-5579/2019 2025:DHC:1216
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SH. SATYA PRAKASH & ANR.
- Respondent
- STATE & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 25.02.2025 CRL.M.C. 5579/2019 & CRL.M.A. 39376/2019 SH. SATYA PRAKASH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur Sr. Adv with Mr. Shailesh Jha, Mr. Vignesh Ramanathan Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State. Mr. A.K. Singh, Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr. Haridwar Singh and Mr. Kamlesh Kamal, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [hereafter ‗Cr.P.C.’] on behalf of the petitioners – Sh. Satya Prakash and Sh. Rameshwar – seeking quashing of FIR No. 96/2017, registered on the complaint of respondent no. 2 – Smt. Bijaya Laxmi Mishra – on 27.02.2017, at Police Station Vasant Kunj North, District South-West, Delhi, for 2. Essentially, the petitioners‘ grievance is that the present FIR is a cross FIR registered with the ulterior motive, in connivance with one Sub-Inspector Sh. Sandeep Kumar, who had visited the residence of the petitioner no. 1 (Sh. Satya Prakash) in the enquiry of DD no. 37A, recorded pursuant t