SANJAY BHAVSINGH PATIL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE MINISTRY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

Digitally signed by TRUPTI TRUPTI SADANAND SADANAND BAMNE BAMNE Date: 2025.02.21 10:48:33 +0530 Trupti 901-wp-7784-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7784 OF 2024 Shri Sanjay Bhavsingh Patil, Aged 49 Years, Occ. Service, R/at 7, Apurva Row House, Peth Road, NearR.T.O.Office, Suryawanshi Vyavam Shala, Durga Nagar, Panchvati, Nashik. … Petitioner Versus 1] The State of Maharashtra, Through the Minister for Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2] The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nasik. 3] The Chairman, Standing Medical Board, Sir. J.J.Group of Hospital, Mumbai 400 001 ... Respondents ---- Mr.Sachin Gite for the Petitioner. Mr.P.P.Kakade, Addl.GP with Mr.Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent No. 1, State. Mr.Rohit Sakhadeo for Respondent No.2. ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 17th February, 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties. 1 of 12 Trupti 901-wp-7784-2024.odt 2. On 30th January, 2025, we had passed the following order : “1. Heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides and the learned Additional Government Pleader on behalf of the State. 2. Normally, the Courts are extremely slow in interfering with the orders of the suspension, if the competent Authority has exercised the power duly vested in it by law. However, in cases where the suspension order is issued by an Incompetent Authority, or such order cannot be justified, that this Court has interfered in suspension orders. 3. The case before us is quite peculiar. The Petitioner claims to be suffering from 40% visual impairment. He submits that his first certificate is of 2009, wherein, he was found to be suffering from