SACHIN NAGPAL vs GOPAL KRISHAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12.02.2025 RC.REV. 326/2024 & CM APPL. 66207/2024 SACHIN NAGPAL .....Petitioner Through: Vikas Khatri, Mr. Manas Khatri, Ms. Khushboo Pathak & Ms. Seema Khatri, Advocates. versus GOPAL KRISHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kunal Kher, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/tenant seeking to challenge the order dated 25.09.2024 passed by the learned CCJ cum ARC (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Leave to Defend/Contest Application filed by the Petitioner/tenant has been dismissed. The premises in issue is a private Shop No.11, situated at First Floor of Property bearing No. 413, Gali Rajan Kalan, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110006 [hereinafter referred to as the “subject premises”]. 2. This Court had examined the Impugned Order on the last date of hearing as well as today. 3. The Petitioner/tenant had, on the previous date, raised the same contention that he has raised today. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the 4. Learned Counsel for the Petition