RINKU vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 3rd February, 2025 + W.P.(CRL) 273/2025 RINKU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Verma & Mr. Dinesh Singh Bachgoti, Advs. alongwith petitioner in person versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Aggarwal & Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advs. with ASI Sushil Kumar Tyagi, PS Dayalpur. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A…../2025 (for listing of the matter) (to be numbered by the Registry) 2. The present application has been moved on behalf of the State seeking listing of the present petition pursuant to the directions passed by the Court on the last date of hearing i.e., 27th January, 2025. 3. The matter has been mentioned today and it is submitted that the missing girl has been traced. 4. Considering the above, the application is allowed and disposed of. The matter has been directed to be listed before the Court today. 5. The Registry is directed to number the present application. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL W.P.(CRL) 273/2025 Page 1 of 6 Signing Date:04.02.2025 15:46 W.P.(CRL) 273/2025 6. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner-Rinku under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for production of his daughter, who is stated to be a minor. 7. The petition has been mentioned before the Court and it has been informed by the ld. Standing Counsel, Criminal that the girl has been recovered. Accordingly, the case has been directed to be listed. 8. A brief background of the present case is that on 13th January, 2025 the daugh