RAM NARESH & ANR. vs GNCT DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 18th February, 2025 + W.P.(CRL) 479/2025 RAM NARESH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohd Yasin, Mr. Dawneesh Shaktivats, Mr. Sami Ahmed and Ms. Himanshi Mehta, Advs. (M: 9648594449) versus GNCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya, Advs. with SI Ajay, PS Kalindi Kunj. Mr. P. Amrut and Mr. Keshav Bhardwaj, Advs. (M: 7771848348) Keshav Bhardwaj Respondent no 2 Mr. Keshav Bhardwaj, Adv. (M: 8510825551) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present writ petition is filed in the nature of habeas corpus seeking the production of Petitioner No.2’s wife-Ms. ‘P’. Petitioner No.1 is the father of the missing wife and Petitioner No.2 is the husband of the missing wife. 3. The Petitioner No.2 and Ms. P got married on 25th January, 2023. The allegation is that initially she left the matrimonial home in February, 2024 and went to her parental house. Thereafter, a person by the name of Mr. Rohit Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS W.P.(CRL) 479/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signing Date:19.02.2025 15:51:51 Sharma, who claims to be an advocate, has been keeping her company. On the social media platforms, it is also claimed by both Mr. Rohit and Ms. P that they are engaged. Ms. P also switched off her mobile phone and has started using the mobile phone of the said Mr. Sharma. Certain WhatsApp messages and Instagram handle postings have also been placed on record to establish the identity of said Mr. Rohit Sharma. The legal notice is also placed on record dated 18th October, 2024 which is sent by Mr. Rohit Sharma, wherein he has alleged