RAJESH @ TINKU vs STATE

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on: 11th September, 2024 Pronounced on: 6th February, 2025 + CRL.A. 826/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 85/2024 RAJESH @ TINKU .....Appellant Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Mr. Lalit Luthra and Ms. Divya Yadav, Advocates (M- 9910645959). Insp. Amit Kr. DPA, Insp. V. Jha, Rohini, Insp. Kishore Kumar, P.S. South Rohini. + CRL.A. 1073/2018 RAVINDER @ TUNDA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Mr. Lalit Luthra and Ms. Divya Yadav, Advocates (M- 9910645959). Insp. Amit Kr. DPA, Insp. V. Jha, Rohini, Insp. Kishore Kumar, P.S. South Rohini. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHIWANI NEGI CRL.A. 826/2018 and connected matters Page 1 of 61 Signing Date:06.02.2025 05:19:06 + CRL.A. 1108/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 189/2024 RUSY @ SURENDER .....Appellant Through: Ms. Arundhati Katju, Advocate (DHCLSC). versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Mr. Lalit Luthra and Ms. Divya Yadav, Advocates (M- 9910645959). Insp. Amit Kr. DPA, Insp. V. Jha, Rohini, Insp. Kishore Kumar, P.S. South Rohini. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA JUDGMENT AMIT SHARMA, J. 1. The present appeals under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short, ‘CrPC’) have been filed by the Appellants assailing the impugned judgment of conviction dated 24.04.2018 and order on sentence dated 03.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-02, North Rohini Courts, Delhi, whereby the Appellants have been convicted in Sessions Case No. 58155/16, arising out of FIR No. 152/12, under Sections 302/406//396/457/