Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-14

RAJESH KUMAR vs HARMINDER SINGH WALIA

Citation / case number
RC.REV.-186/2016 2025:DHC:1359
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJESH KUMAR
Respondent
HARMINDER SINGH WALIA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 14.02.2025 RC.REV. 186/2016, CM APPL. 10885/2016 & CM APPL. 40144/2021 RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vibhor Bagga, Ms. Esha Dogra, Ms. Sunakshi Dogra, Advs. with Petitioner in-person versus HARMINDER SINGH WALIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/tenant impugning an order dated 18.11.2015 passed by Ld. SCJ-RC, Rohini Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’]. By the Impugned Order, the Application for Leave to Defend/contest filed by the Petitioner/tenant was dismissed. The premises in issue is one shop on the ground floor of property bearing No. WZ-884, Rani Bagh, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘subject premises’]. 2. As can be seen from above, the matter has been pending for almost nine years. This Court by an order dated 22.03.2016, while passing interim directions, had affixed user charges at the rate Rs.6,000/- per month in the matter. The matter has thereafter continued before this Court. 3. On 06.02.2025, this Court had briefly heard the Res

RAJESH KUMAR vs HARMINDER SINGH WALIA · Niyam