Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-27

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 175 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 175 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 175 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11799-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 175 of 2025 Petitioner :- Panchmukhi Dashinishwar Nath Mahadev Ji Mandir Thru. Next Friend,Vivek Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Prajapati,Piyush Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Sri Ram Kewal Tripathi, learned counsel has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.5 and 7, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Ram Kewal Tripathi, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite parties no.5 and 7. The nature of dispute involved in the present writ petition filed in public interest is essentially a civil dispute and for grant of any relief as has been sought herein, the disputed question of facts being involved would necessarily require leading of evidence by the respective parties. This Court cannot go into the disputed questions of facts which require leading of evidence as is well settled. The petitioner in the circumstances of the case may be

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 175 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam