Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-27

PREM KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-2978/2022 2025:DHC:1520-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PREM KUMAR
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27.02.2025 (11)+ W.P.(C) 2978/2022 (12)+ W.P.(C) 12268/2022 PREM KUMAR .....Petitioner SURENDER PRAKASH NAYYAR .....Petitioner Through: Dr.S.S.Hooda, Mr.Aditya Hooda, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Nidhi Raman, CGSC, Mr.Akash Mishra, Mr.Arnav Mittal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) 1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners, challenging paragraph 3(V) (wrongly mentioned as paragraph 2(V) in the prayer clause) of the Office Memorandum (‘OM’) No. 45/22/97-P&PW(C) dated 03.02.2000 issued by Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare, to the limited extent that it caps the aggregate of the service and disability element of pension at the pay last drawn, for 100% disability. 2. As both the petitions raise similar grievances and challenge in 2022. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners, referring to the OM No. 45/22/97-P&PW(C) dated 03.02.2000, submits that paragraph 5 of the said OM, recognizing that persons suffering from different percentages of disability cannot be equated for grant of the dis