PREETI RANA vs M/S SUNSHINE TRADE TOWERS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~O-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 73/2024 Date of Decision: 17.02.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: PREETI RANA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. T. N. Saxena, Mr. Akshat Aggarwal, Mr. Aakash Shankar and Mr. V. K. Singh, Advs. versus M/S SUNSHINE TRADE TOWERS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Siddharth Nandwani, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) I.A. 2251/2024 (filed by the plaintiff for grant of ex parte ad interim injunction) 1. There is already an interim order operating in favour of the plaintiff in terms of the order dated 15.02.2024. 2. Let the same be made absolute. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. The application stands disposed of. I.A. 2252/2024 (filed by the plaintiff seeking exclusion of the time of proceedings) 5. This is an application filed under Section 14 of the Limitation Act whereby, certain time is sought to be excluded on the ground that the Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRIYA Digitally Signed Signing Date:01.03.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 16:06:46 KUMAR KAURAV plaintiff was proceeding bone fidely in some other court. 6. The aforesaid issue can be adjudicated during the trial and, therefore, there is no necessity to file a separate application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 7. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of reserving all rights and contentions of the parties. I.A. 30953/2024 (filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeking direction) 8. The Court observes that the evidence and the attestation of the documents shall take place strictly in accordance with the law. 9. The aforesaid aspect shall be ensured by the concerned Joint Registrar. Besides this, nothing more is required to be observed in the instant