Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-28

PAYAL BANQUETS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR vs STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AR & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-16341/2024 2025:DHC:1357
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PAYAL BANQUETS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
Respondent
STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AR & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 28th February, 2025 W.P.(C) 16341/2024 & CM APPL. 68984-68985/2024 PAYAL BANQUETS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Choudhary, Mr. Paras Mithal and Mr. Gaurav Raj, Advocates versus STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AR & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Apoorv Sarvaria, Ms. Yashika Sarvaria, Advocates for R-1/SBI. Mr. Vaibhav Dang, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Akshay Goel and Mr. Harsh Jadon, Advocates for R-3, 4 and 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 68985/2024 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 16341/2024 & CM APPL. 68984/2024 1. The request of petitioner is somewhat unusual. 2. The petitioner owns one half of industrial property situated at Khewat No.17, Khasra No.30, Kila No.24, in Sector 29, Village Hashmabad, Sonepat. 3. The other half of the property has been re-possessed by the bank by way of appointment of a receiver and is now to be auctioned. 4. Petitioner submits that since he is the owner of the adjacent portion and since the super-structure on both the abovesaid plots is integral one, 5. Quite evidently, the g