OM PARKASH DANG (THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER) vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 10th February, 2025 + W.P.(C) 1598/2025 & CM APPL. 7783/2025 & CM APPL. 7784/2025 OM PARKASH DANG (THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Kumar Pandey & Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, SPC with Mr. Kapil Dev Yadav, GP with Mr. Vivek Sansanwal, Advocate for R- 1/UOI Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Ritika Bansal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 7783/2025 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1598/2025 & CM APPL. 7784/2025 1. Petitioner Om Parkash Dang happens to be son of Ms. Veeran Bai (since deceased). 2. Ms. Veeran Bai had been allotted land under Gadgil Assurance Scheme way back on 10.10.1979, being found eligible for allotment/regularisation of plot against T No. 1895 under Category-A on usual terms and conditions. 3. Ms. Veeran Bai unfortunately died on 03.01.1994. 4. After her death, a request was made to the respondents for Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 1598/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:11.02.2025 14:47:06 regularization of the aforesaid plot and according to petitioner, there is no decision on such representation. 5. The prayer, inter alia, in the present petition is a direction to respondent-DDA to regularize the aforesaid allotment. 6. Though it is noticed that the allotment was way back in the year 1979 and the representation was made in the year 2022 only, fact remains that such representation has yet not been decided. Petitioner contends that they had been chasing the department by visiting the department and making oral prayer, every now and then. 7. Learned counsel