Bombay High Court · 2025-02-12
NEW SONAL INDUSTRIAL PREMISES LIMITED vs DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR (2) CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETIES AND ORS
- Citation / case number
- WP/10548/2024
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- NEW SONAL INDUSTRIAL PREMISES LIMITED
- Respondent
- DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR (2) CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETIES AND ORS
Judgment text excerpt
Neeta Sawant WP-10548-2024-FC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10548 OF 2024 New Sonal Industries Premises Ltd. ….Petitioner : Versus : 1 District Deputy Registrar (2), Co-operative Societies 2. M/s. Nandu Builders, a Partnership Firm 3. All legal heirs of Vrajlal Damodar Mehta (Landowners Lessors) a. Mahendra Vrajlal Mehta b. Mr. Bipin Vrajlal Mehta 4. Smt. Tulsibai Narayandas Asave a. Mahendra Vrajlal Mehta b. Mr. Bipin Vrajlal Mehta 5. Smt. Maniben Ramjibhai Mehta 6. Smt. Jivtiben Popatlal Shah 7. Smt. Kanchanlaxmi Hargovind Mehta 8. Shri. Hargovind Mehta 9. Manharlaxmi Chhotalal Mehta 10. Shri. Hargovinddas Ramjibhai Mehta 11. Chhotalal Ramjibhai Mehta 12. Jayantilal Ramjibhai Mehta 13. Bhagwandas Popatlal Shah 14. Minal Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. 15. Aditya Vardhan Co-op Hsg. Soc. Ltd. 16. Shrushti Plaza Premises Co-op. Soc. Ltd. ….Respondents Mr. Pradeep Thorat with Mr. Aniesh Jadhav i/by. Mr. Pushparaj Singh, for the Petitioner. Mr. Faran Khan with Mr. P. Shah, Ms. Smita Durve, Ms. Yukta Palve i/by. Mr. Arshil Shah, for Respondent No.2. NEETA Ms. A.A. Nadkarni, for Respondent-State. SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2025.02.13 13:19:07 +0530 Page No.1 of 26 12 February 2025 Neeta Sawant WP-10548-2024-FC CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Reserved On : 29 January 2025. Pronounced On : 12 February 2025. JUDGMENT : 1) The petition challenges the order dated 24 August 2023 passed by the Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar granting unilateral deemed conveyance of land admeasuring 3832.30 sq. mtrs. in favour of the Petitioner-Society. The certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance is challenged to the extent that he does not convey the entire land admeasuring 8647.80 sq. mtrs in f