NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION & ORS. vs DINESH KUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2534/2025 and CM APPLs. 11966-68/2025 NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC versus DINESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ridhi Dua for Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 28.02.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The order challenged in this writ petition reads thus: “We would have passed common order(s) in all the cases. However, request was made on behalf of official respondents to pass separate order(s) in each OA for taking appropriate action and administrative measures. We accept the said plea. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue raised in this OA stands concluded by the decision of this Tribunal titled as Vikas Kumar Sain V/s Staff Selection Commission and Ors.1 decided on 22.04.2024. 3. For parity of reasons, we allow the present OA in terms of the directions given in the aforesaid OA. However, for the sake of the convenience, the directions given by the Tribunal in Vikas Kumar Sain (Supra) case are reproduced below:- 1 Order dated 22 April 2024 in OA No. 3726/2023 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT W.P.(C) 2534/2025 Page 1 of 3 KUMAR Signing Date:04.03.2025 15:00:44 “9. We deem fit and proper to dispose of all the OAs with the directions that provisional offer of appointment is made absolute, however, subject to stipulation that the same shall be subject to the outcome of the enquiry, if any, against any particular individual. 10. We also clarify that any findings qua the applicant(s) herein and the similarly situated where there any adverse finding in enquiry, the same shall always be open to challenge without prejudice to the rig