MR. BRIJ MOHAN GUPTA vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21st February, 2025 + W.P.(C) 2056/2025 MR. BRIJ MOHAN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arpit Bhalla, Mr. Tushar and Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocates along with Petitioner. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Iram Majid, CGSC With Mr. Mohd. Suboor and Mr. M. Seham Khan, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Arun Aggarwal with Mr. Shivam Saini and Mr. Satyadev Prakash, Advocates for R-3/Bank of Baroda. Mr. Ramesh Babu and Ms. Tanya Chowdhary, Advocates for RBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 9687/2025 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2056/2025 1. Learned counsel for respondent No.3/Bank of Baroda seeks permission to place on record certain documents. 2. Such documents are taken on record. 3. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for petitioner during the course of hearing. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 2056/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:24.02.2025 15:48:11 4. According to Mr. Arun Aggarwal, learned counsel for respondent/Bank of Baroda, there is nothing further to be done in the present matter by Bank of Baroda and the petitioner can always pursue his remedy with Reserve Bank of India. 5. It is noticed that earlier a complaint was lodged by petitioner with Reserve Bank of India and the same was disposed of on 12.12.2024 while observing that the petitioner had not filed his complaint with concerned bank i.e. Bank of Baroda before approaching RBI and, therefore, the same was directed to be closed. Simultaneously, the Reserve Bank of India had also forwarded the complaint in question to Bank of Baroda for their review and response and it was also mentioned that if RBI does not receive any