MOHAN LAL vs STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 27th February, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 3425/2021 MOHAN LAL A-301, Meghdoot Apartments, Plot -19, Sector-7, Dwarka, Delhi - 110075 .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. Versus 1. STATE OF G.N.C.T. OF DELHI Through Chief Secretary, G.N.C.T. of Delhi, 5th Level, Delhi Secretariat, Delhi – 110002. .....Respondent No.1. 2. Sandeep Aggarwal son of Sh. Bal Kishan Aggarwal llnd Floor, 70 Tagore Park, Delhi – 110009. .....Respondent No.2. 3. Pankaj Kumar Rajan, Advocate, Ch. No. 340 Civil Wing, Tis Hazari Court Advocates Chambers, Delhi – 110054. .....Respondent No.3. Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Ld. APP for the State with SI Sanjeeta P.S. Mukherjee Nagar. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate for private Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA CRL.M.C. 3425/2021 Page 1 of 14 Signing Date:10.03.2025 20:05:32 1. Petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’ hereinafter) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed to challenge the Order dated 04.09.2021 of learned ASJ upholding the Order of learned M.M. dated 15.12.2020 whereby the Complaint filed by the Petitioner under Section 200 Cr.P.C., has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated, Respondent No.2, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Rajan filed a Complaint against his wife (who is the daughter of the Petitioner Mohan Lal) in which he also was impleaded, which was dismissed. The Order was challenged by way of a Revision Petition. 3. The Petitioner, Mohan Lal then filed a Complaint on the ground that there was tampering of record while the matter was pending before the Court of learned ASJ. In the affidavit of Sh. Pankaj Kumar Rajan, th