MACMA/1261/2012 of SRI VISWANADHA VENKATA PAVAN KUMR, VIS. Vs SRI SHAIK ABDUL KHADER, HYD & ANO

APHC010675662012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3365] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1261 OF 2012 Between: Sri Viswanadha Venkata Pavan Kumar ...APPELLANT AND Sri Shaik Abdul Khader and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: Sri Viswanadha Venkata Pavan Kumar is the claimant and his claim for compensation sustained by him was enquired into by the Tribunal, granted Rs. 55,000/- (Rupees fifty five thousand only). Aggrieved by its, he preferred this Appeal. 2. Today, as well as on earlier occasions, it is only the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 Insurance Company has been present. There has been no representation for the Appellant. In fact, on the direction of this Court, Registry had addressed a letter to the appellant and it was returned un-served with an endorsement that ‘no such address’. On verifying the records, it is seen that the Registry addressed letters basing on the address printed in