M/S BIHARI LAL MANOJ KUMAR vs DEEPAK SHARMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.02.2025 RC.REV. 205/2020, CM APPL. 23473/2020, CM APPL. 23475/2020 M/S BIHARI LAL MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kumika, Adv. with Proprietor of the Petitioner in-person versus DEEPAK SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lakshay Malhotra, Adv. with Respondent in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The proprietor of the Petitioner and the Respondent are physically present before the Court today. 2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time upto 31.05.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 31.05.2025, subject to the Petitioner paying user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this is acceptable to the Petitioner. 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitione