KAVITA AND ORS vs GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1398/2025, CM APPLs. 6771/2025, 6772/2025 & 6773/2025 KAVITA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Krishna Murari Singh, Adv. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Mahur and Mr. Harkesh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 06.02.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. In view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Rajeev Kumar v Hemraj Singh Chauhan1, as well as the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta in Sujit Roy v State of West Bengal2 and the High Court of Bombay in Bharat K. Dehade v Purushottam Das Sharma3, this petition is not maintainable. 1 (2010) 4 SCC 554 2 (2019) SCC OnLine Cal 5158 3 (2018) SCC OnLine Bom 2840 Signature Not Verified Signed By:MEENU W.P.(C) 1398/2025 Page 1 of 2 KALRA Signing Date:13.02.2025 11:45:19 2. The remedy of the petitioner according to these decisions would be by means of fresh OA before the Tribunal. 3. Mr. Krishna Murari Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners, seeks to withdraw this petition, submitting that he would avail his remedies under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunal Act. 4. Reserving leave and liberty as aforesaid, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. FEBRUARY 6, 2025 sk Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Signed By:MEENU W.P.(C) 1398/2025 Page 2 of 2 KALRA Signing Date:13.02.2025 11:45:19