KAILASH vs ROHTASH KUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20.02.2025 + RC.REV. 269/2024 & CM APPL. 58148/2024 KAILASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kohli & Ms. Dipika Prasad, Advocates with Petitioner in person. versus ROHTASH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The Petitioner and Respondent are physically present in Court today. 2. Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably reached an amicable resolution with respect to their inter se disputes. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Petitioner need additional time of six months to vacate the tenanted premises up to 20.08.2025. 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that this offer is acceptable to the Respondent. In lieu of the early vacation of the tenanted premises, the learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent agrees to forego all claims for user charges and damages. 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HONEY ARORA Signing Date:22.02.2025 RC.REV. 269/2024 Page 1 of 3 05:44:56 the Petitioner, within a week undertaking that: (i) The Petitioner shall hand over the physical possession of the premises i.e., shop no. 38/16, Khanpur Ext., Main M.B. Road, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]; (ii) The vacant, physical and peaceful possession of the subject premises will be handed over by the Petitioner to the Respondent on or before 20.08.2025; (iii) The Petitioner undertakes and confirms that the entire subject premises is u