Delhi High Court · 2025-02-14
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER vs AAKASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- REVIEW PET.-5/2025 2025:DHC:1353
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
- Respondent
- AAKASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of order: 14th February, 2025 + REVIEW PET. 5/2025 in RFA 171/2022 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER .....Appellant Through: None versus AAKASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Advocate for Review Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH ORDER CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral) CM APPL. 1176/2025 (seeking condonation of delay in filing Review Petition) 1. The instant application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed on behalf of the applicant/respondent no. 1 seeking condonation of delay in filing the review petition. 2. For the sufficient cause being shown in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 105 days, in filing the review petition, is condoned. 3. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. REVIEW PET. 5/2025 (For review of the judgment dt. 21st August, 2024) 4. The instant review petition under Section 114 read with Section 151 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed REVIEW PET. 5/2025 in RFA 171/2022 Page 1 of 11 By:GAURAV SHARMA Signing Date:01.03.2025 15:16:26 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter “CPC”) has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 1/review petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “(a) review the judgment dated 21.08.2024, passed by this Hon'ble Court in RFA No.171/2022 titled as “Executive Engineer vs. Aakash Construction Company & Anr”, in the interest of justice. (b) consequently dismiss the appeal being the RFA No.171/2022 titled as "Executive Engineer vs. Aakash Construction Company & Anr.” (c) pass any other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of this case.” 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1/ review peti