DR. R.K. JAIN vs THE STATE NCT

Judgment text excerpt

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 17th February, 2025 + W.P.(CRL) 3485/2018, CRL.M.A. 18020/2023, CRL.M.A. 25684/2023, CRL.M.A. 37182/2024 DR. R.K. JAIN S/O LATE SH.S.P.JAIN, R/O B-13/S1, DILSHAD GARDEN, DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus THE STATE, NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates and SI Vicky Kumar P.S. Preet Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The Amended Petition under Articles 226, 215 of the Constitution of India read with Articles 14, 15, 19, 21 of Constitution, Section 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (‘PC Act’ hereinafter) and Sections 482, 483 and 357 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’ hereinafter) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, wherein the prayers made essentially are that : (i) the digitized record annexed to the Appeal is not of the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 3485/2018 Page 1 of 4 By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:22.02.2025 13:57:33 complete record and various documents as specified therein which are though available in the physical file of the learned Trial Court, has not been intentionally digitized and placed before this Court; (ii) for registration of FIR against the Complainant Anuradha Jain and the public functionaries for the documented fraud and other cognizable offences punishable under Section 108/109/120B/181/191/192/193/195/196/198/l99/200/208/209/21 1/304/307/380/384/406/411/418/420/466/468/469/471/ 474/477-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ hereinafter) and also separate FIR against the I.O Sh. Sat Narain/the then SHO Gurucharan Singh and ACP P.S. Preet Vihar Mr. Yashveer Singh