Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-03

DR. B.K. TIWARI ADVISER (NUTRITION) vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-7992/2017 2025:DHC:691-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
DR. B.K. TIWARI ADVISER (NUTRITION)
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7992/2017 DR. B.K. TIWARI ADVISER (NUTRITION) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna and Mr. V. Shashank Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, SPC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 03.02.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. The issue 1. The petitioner, who was occupying the post of Advisor (Nutrition) in the Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, sought parity of pay with the posts of Advisor (Ayurveda) and Advisor (Homeopathy). The Central Administrative Tribunal1 has, by judgment dated 7 October 2016 render in OA 3216/2011, rejected his claim. 2. The petitioner is before us, challenging the said decision. 3. As such, the only issue in consideration is whether the post of Advisor (Nutrition) is entitled to parity of pay with the post of Advisor (Ayurveda) and Advisor (Homeopathy). 4. We have heard Mr. V. Shashank Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, at length. 5. Before adverting to Mr. Shashank Kumar’s submissions, we may note that the issue of whether the post of Advisor (Nut