DALIP SINGH vs DURGA PRASAD SHARMA & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 19.02.2025 RC.REV. 362/2019 & CM Appl.27114/2019 DALIP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shellen Kumar and Mr. Manak Budhiraja, Advs. versus DURGA PRASAD SHARMA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Ms. Aayushi Jain and Mr. Mohit, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. This Court has briefly heard the parties on 31.01.2025 and had given a prima facie finding that the remedy of the Petitioner does not lie before this Court. The relevant extract of the order dated 31.01.2025 is reproduced below: “… 2. It is the plea of the Petitioner that he was in possession of the subject premises in his independent right and not as a tenant. 3. Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 submits that the operation of the Impugned Order was stayed by the Court on 30.05.2019, and thereafter, the Petitioner has continued in an uninterrupted possession of the subject premises without paying any user and occupation charges, rental or damages. It is further contended that the Petitioner has no rights in the subject premises and seeks to rely upon paragraph 14 of the Impugned Order to sub