CRP/1096/2022 of PEETHALA PAPAYAMMA Vs THE COMMISSIONER

APHC010286272022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3311] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1096/2022 Between: Peethala Papayamma ...PETITIONER AND The Commissioner and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. SITA RAM CHAPARLA 3. CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR 4. JAGADISH KUAMAR BATCHU The Court made the following: 2 BSB, J C.R.P.No.1096 of 2022 ORDER: This revision is preferred against the order, dated 07.06.2022, allowing the revision filed by the respondents 2 and 3 herein, in Ref. No.Sett.II(1)/156/2017, under Section 14A of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 challenging the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam passed in D.Dis.No.11049/2015/C, dt.07.06.2017, confirming the order, dated 31.12.2013, of the Special Deputy Tahsildar (Inams), Visakhapatnam, in AIP No.32 of 2013 granting ryotwari patta in favour of Smt. Peethala Papayamma w/o late Apparao for an extent of Ac.14.00 c