CRLRC/399/2010 of Tandu Narasamma, Vs The State through Public Prosecutor,

APHC010705682010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3521] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 399/2010 Between: Tandu Narasamma, ...PETITIONER AND The State Through Public Prosecutor and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P MEENAKSHI PRASUNAMBA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri M.Eswar, learned counsel, representing Sri Kirthi Teja Kondaveeti, learned counsel for petitioner, submits that the matter has become infructuous inasmuch as the sole accused/respondent No.2 died long back. 2. The revision was filed challenging the return endorsement dated 17.03.2009 made by the Sessions Judge, Krishna, saying that how the application of the petitioner/defacto complainant could be entertained after passing of committal order and after assigning Sessions Case No.319 of 2008 duly taking cognizance of the offence under Section 354 of I.P.C., basing on the contents of charge sheet. 3. Mr.K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor h