CMA/1355/2012 of AMRUTHAM MALLAIH Vs MADDI PRUDHVI RAJU AND ANOTHERS

APHC010482602012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1355/2012 Between: Amrutham Mallaih ...APPELLANT AND Maddi Prudhvi Raju And Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: 1. E VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAMACHANDRAREDDY GADI 2. . The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.1355 of 2012 JUDGMENT: 1. The present C.M.A is filed under Section 30 of Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 questioning the Order dated 04.11.2011 in W.C.No.93 of 2009 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation & Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Guntur, Guntur District. 2. At the time of hearing, it is represented by Sri K. Siva Prasad, proxy counsel for Sri E. Venugopal Reddy, learned counsel for the Appellants/Claimants that they have received instructions to withdraw the appeal in view of the settlement arrived at between the Appellants/Claimants and the Insurance Company before the Lok Adalat. 3. Recording th