Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-21

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 32 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 32 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 32 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11400-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 32 of 2025 Applicant :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. State Tax U.P. Lko. And Another Opposite Party :- Rajnesh Kumar And Another Counsel for Applicant :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the review-applicants. This is an application seeking review of the judgment/order dated 24.08.2023 passed by this Court in Writ-A No.6270 of 2023 which is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay. There is a delay of 508 days in filing this review application. On due consideration of the explanation submitted before this Court seeking condonation of delay in filing the review application of the order dated 24.08.2023, we are not convinced that the review-applicants has assigned any plausible justification except a routine explanation for making out a case for condoning the delay. The Apex Court in the case of Basawaraj and Another versus Special Land Acquisition Officer [AIR 2014 SC 746] while rejecting an application for condonation of delay for lack of sufficient cause has concluded in Paragraph 15 a

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 32 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam