CHETAN DAYAL vs THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (HQS) TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 17th February, 2025 + CONT.CAS(C) 34/2025 & CM APPL. 1790/2025 CHETAN DAYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prince Bansal, Advocate along with petitioner-in-person versus THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (HQS) TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD (Services) with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat and Mr. Amitoj Chadha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 1790/2025 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CONT.CAS(C) 34/2025 1. Learned counsel for respondents appears on advance notice. 2. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, learned Standing Counsel for GNCTD submits that in terms of the specific directions given by this Court vide order dated 13.09.2024 in W.P. (C) No. 12865/2024, the department has already taken a decision on 08.11.2024. 3. It is noticed that even petitioner is aware about the decision taken in this regard as along with the petition, he has placed on record a communication which he had received from the respondents in this regard. 4. It is noticed that while the decision was communicated to the petitioner few extracts of the Minutes of Selection Committee were mentioned therein Signature Not Verified CONT.CAS(C) 34/2025 1 Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:19.02.2025 12:37:32 which perhaps led him to presume that such decision was not in consonance with the directions given by this Court. 5. During course of hearing and as directed by this Court, the complete Minutes of Meeting pertaining to the petitioner’s grievance has been brought. Same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for petitioner.