Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-02-21

CASIO INDIA COMPANY PRIVATE LTD. vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 4 2 & ANR.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-13171/2024 2025:DHC:1194-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
CASIO INDIA COMPANY PRIVATE LTD.
Respondent
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 4 2 & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 13171/2024 CASIO INDIA COMPANY PRIVATE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney with Mr. Nikhil Agarwal, Mr. Puru Medhira and Mr. Nishank Vashistha, Advocates. versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 4 2 & ANR. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin, Advocate. Date of decision: 21st February, 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGEMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J : (ORAL) 1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to delete the outstanding demand for Assessment Year (AY) 2006-07 being reflected on the Income Tax portal of the petitioner; and to accept the returned position on the corporate tax issues for which no appeal effect order has been placed pursuant to the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), and release consequential refunds alongwith statutory interest. 2. It is stated that the petitioner’s case was selected for scrutiny and an assessment order dated 28.09.2010 was passed by the Assessing Officer W.P.(C) 13171/2024 07. It is stated that thereafter, a