BABITA VISHNOI & ANR. vs BANK OF BARODA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: 17th February, 2025 % LPA 114/2025, CM APPLs. 9292/2025, 9293/2025, 9294/2025 & 9295/2025 BABITA VISHNOI & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Pawan Kumar and Mr. Satish Kumar, Advs. versus BANK OF BARODA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr.Shivam Saini and Mr. Satyadev Prakash, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. (ORAL) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records available before us in this Letters Patent Appeal (hereinafter referred to as ‘LPA’). 2. This appeal questions the order dated 01.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 13798/2024, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed on the ground that the appellants/petitioners has got the statutory remedy available to them by way of invoking Section 18 of the LPA 114/2025 3. Learned counsel for the appellants/petitioners has submitted that for filing an appeal, the appellants/petitioners will be required to make certain deposit in terms of the requirement of the second proviso mandated under Section 18 of the SARF